However both of these columns are horribly deficient, which ruins their utility (the number of fonts is listed once besides three that say any). Why is the programming language it's own column? The real features do not begin until the end of the table, where at least the number of languages and number of fonts supported can be viewed as a differentiator between the softwares.
#INFTYREADER FORMAT SOFTWARE#
While the operating platform is very important to a user, is it really worth dedicating 7 whole columns to it? While I am a big proponent of open source software (I use GNU/Linux on all boxen both at work and at home), I don't consider that it should be the primary feature (hence the first column that bears a feature) when evaluating which OCR to choose. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists.Īs it is currently (2010.09.14), the majority of the table is tied up in various secondary concerns. Text and/or other creative content from this version of OCR SDK was copied or moved into List of optical character recognition software with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Text and/or other creative content from this version of OCR Software was copied or moved into List of optical character recognition software with this edit. Text and/or other creative content from this version of Optical character recognition was copied or moved into List of optical character recognition software with this edit. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.
0 kommentar(er)
